Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 10,125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
I wrote about Hyman v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Recently, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am
V–Sketch of the Geology of Mississippi Art. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am
If he omits to do so, he will be deemed by his silence to have acquiesced, and will be bound by it as an account stated, unless fraud, mistake or other equitable considerations are shown. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
As demonstrated by the case of Lynch v Avaya Canada Corporation, the courts are not bound by any such restriction. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
As demonstrated by the case of Lynch v Avaya Canada Corporation, the courts are not bound by any such restriction. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
”[10] Once the parties mutually agree to enter into arbitration, neither party can unilaterally withdraw from the proceedings and are legally bound to accept the arbitrator’s final decision. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
States can no longer pretend not to know this. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:04 am
In Ţîmpău v Romania [2023] ECHR 982, the applicant, Doina Ţîmpău, challenged her dismissal as a lay teacher of Orthodox religion in a public school. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:53 pm
Wesson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
Here is a PDF copy of the decision: Geiger v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
The questions included whether Mr Ho was bound by the exclusive foreign jurisdiction clause. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (CAAT) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020 provides useful insight into how well-established principles of “irrationality” apply in the international arms trade context, and the extent to which the latitude afforded to the executive in this policy area affects this process. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:08 am
However, it went even further by stating, “any controversy over interpretations of this Agreement will be decided without regard to events of drafting or preparation. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
It is only after that process is completed that equitable relief may be pursued.Since W.K. first needed to exhaust all “administrative remedies” with the PHHPC, (as outlined in the state’s Public Health Law), before seeking an injunction, the AD2 thought the order compelling his admittance was issued prematurely and was thus rescinded.This couldn't be what the doctor ordered ….# # #DECISIONW.K. v New York Presbyt. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
” Heldebrandt v. [read post]
