Search for: "Brady v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2017, 3:30 pm by karen
A photographer and a photo agency are teaming up to restart a legal war against online linking in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Bell (relisted after the 4/22 Conference) Docket: 10-8629 Issue(s): (1) Whether the prosecution violated Brady v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am by John Elwood
Doster, 23-154Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm by Nathan Dorn
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am by Max Kennerly
The United States Supreme Court, the least productive court in the nation, is back on summer recess until October. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices ruled 5-4 yesterday that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:58 pm
"   Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal, arguing on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of Alaska, addressed Justice Breyer's question by arguing that the Ninth Circuit's extension of Brady rights to the post-conviction context would nullify states' efforts to legislate in this area. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 5:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
In February 2006, Schaffer, who was driving north-bound on United States Highway 77 and was beginning to merge onto Interstate Highway 37 in northwest Corpus Christi, Texas, collided with a truck driven by Brady Lovins. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:03 am by Viking
United States, 983 A.2d 363 (2009) (Download Shelton opinion)[.] [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Furthermore, with respect to the Emerson defendants, it is undisputed that they were not present when the allegedly defamatory statement was made and, significantly, the complaint is bereft of any allegations setting forth a basis to hold them liable for Burrows’s statement (see Bostich v United States Trust Corp., 233 AD2d 193, 194). [read post]