Search for: "Brewer v. Brewer" Results 361 - 380 of 700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2023, 11:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's my post on the petition, from March, though you can read all the filings here: [* * *] William Brewer, Sarah Rogers & Noah Peters of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors and I filed a petition earlier this month asking the Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit decision in NRA v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:35 am by Eric E. Johnson
Anheuser-Busch, brewers of Michelob, sued for trademark infringement and trademark dilution. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 5:08 am by Amy Howe
” In his column for Verdict, Michael Dorf discusses some of the First Amendment issues currently pending before the Court, while at his Dorf on Law blog he urges the Court to deny review in one of those First Amendment cases:  Elane Photography v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:27 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Alan Dershowitz: Zimmerman Arrest Affidavit 'Irresponsible And Unethical' Fundy Settlement v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 1:41 am by elemembers
Case reference: Ms S Wray v JW Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd A worker who is sleeping on premises and ‘on call’ may well be working during that time for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations which has an impact on other statutory entitlements such as how holiday leave is accrued. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:42 am by Walter Olson
” [Volokh] “Chris McGrath v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:56 am by Ilya Somin
(Joe Ravi/Wikimedia/CC-BY-SA 3.0)A few days ago, the Seattle University School of Law held a webinar on Trump v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 1:41 am by elemembers
Case reference: Ms S Wray v JW Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd A worker who is sleeping on premises and ‘on call’ may well be working during that time for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations which has an impact on other statutory entitlements such as how holiday leave is accrued. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:49 pm
The Court of Appeal held: the law supervenes over the intention of the parties The licence agreement did fall within s.79(3) as it was a dwelling house, with exclusive possession and, because excluded from the original property, was entitled to treat it as his only home. from the agreement, the structure and location of the flat, it was clearly a separate dwelling for s.79(3) Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC [1991] 23 HLR 380 CA (Civ Div) and Andrews v Brewer [1998] 30… [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:27 pm by Glenn
Even before the landmark United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Anastasia Wullschleger and Geraldine Brewer (Docket No. 23-677) to be argued on October 7, 2024. [read post]