Search for: "Briggs v. Briggs" Results 361 - 380 of 504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 11:47 pm by Christa Culver
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be reconsidered or clarified? [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
After summarising what the amendment request proposed by 3M entailed, the judge concluded, using the same wording as Lord Briggs in Warner-Lambert, that the proposed amendments to the range of thickness ratios were clearly “designed to make good a claim not thus far advanced in the amended form” (paragraph 13). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
and Sir Michael Briggs (he of the Case of the Pixelated Privates and, more recently, involved in the Fage v Chobani Greek yoghurt litigation, here and here, and on which a further post is expected soon) and Dame Elizabeth Gloster (Pearson Education v Prentice Hall of India, here). [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
 However, Case C-212/08 Zeturf Ltd v Premier Ministre, seems to cast an interesting light on internet trading. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Generally speaking, Lord Carnwath – with whom Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Briggs concurred – held that Part 5A deliberately establishes an uncomplicated set of rules. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:06 am by CMS
In this post, James Warshaw, an associate in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, comments upon the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Lehtimäki and Ors v Cooper [2020] UKSC 33. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:46 am by CMS
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2023] UKSC 12, which was handed down on 22 March 2023. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am by UKSC Blog
DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT The Supreme Court composed of President Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs unanimously dismissed the appeal. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
As I wrote earlier this week, the descendants of plaintiffs in a companion case from South Carolina believe that Brown should be renamed Briggs v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am by CMS
” In a case law context, the five principles governing estoppel by convention were outlined in the decision of Briggs J in Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Benchdollar [2009] EWHC 1310 (Ch) (“Benchdollar”). [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
He says that it was not correct of Mr Harris QC to say that much of the evidence has already been gathered to support their methodology. 1235: Mr Hoskins QC says Mr Harris QC’s proposed methodology does not reveal what is practicable at certification stage. 1232: Lord Briggs asks if ‘preferability’ is different to ‘commonality’ in the Canadian legislation. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be rec [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:14 am by CMS
The appeal was heard on 8 February 2021 before Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
 Unusually, the identity of the man at the centre of the case, Paul Briggs, and his family, has been made public. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am by Michael F. Smith
Briggs (1986), a reasonably well-trained officer would have known that the affidavit and warrant failed to establish probable cause. [read post]