Search for: "Brown v. Housing Commission" Results 361 - 380 of 482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2014, 5:33 am by Tessa Shepperson
My HMO series with David looks at the Management Regulations, and the case of Spencer v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Roy, No. 07-1063"Sentence for violating conditions of supervised release for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's argument that a period of community confinement should have counted towards a 24-month aggregate limit on prison time for violations of supervised release did not constitute a plain error for purposes of plain error review; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to assign defendant to a halfway house despite… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
The leading cases on the nature and extent of the constitutional right to freedom of expression at Irish law are Irish Times v Ireland [1998] 1 IR 359, [1998] 2 ILRM 161 (2 April 1998) (doc | pdf) and Murphy v Independent Radio and Television Commission [1999] 1 IR 12, [1998] 2 ILRM 360 (28 May 1998) (doc | pdf) (which I have considered here); but the insights in these cases have not been applied to or in the defamation context.… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Genao-Sanchez, No. 05-1402 Sentence for drug conspiracy, conspiring to use a firearm in furtherance of a drug conspiracy, and aiding and abetting the commission of a crime, is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court's failure to convene a new sentencing hearing deprived defendant the opportunity to argue his position both as to matters of fact relevant to sentencing, and as to the appropriate sentence to be imposed; and 2) thus, the error was prejudicial. [read post]
II, Section 4) requires the commission of least one crime or violation under positive law. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness:… [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by law shucks
Finally, there was the Google/YouTube v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
’” In terms of the long view of Supreme Court history, wasn’t the progressive spirit of the Warren Court – exemplified in decisions such as Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Legal Beagle
Heather Capital - Lord Woolman’s opinion: Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and othersOUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2015] CSOH 115 CA207/14NOTE BY LORD WOOLMANIn the causeHEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Pursuers; againstLEVY & McRAE AND OTHERS Defenders:Pursuer:  Lord Davidson of Glen Clova QC;  Shepherd & Wedderburn LLPDefenders:  Clark QC, J Brown;  Simpson & Marwick14 August… [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:21 pm
Brown worked for the Ontario Expert Commission on Pensions and made similar recommendations, stating that the rules under the Pension Benefit Act and Income Tax Act stifle innovation. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Senate contests like Sherrod Brown’s in Ohio and Jon Tester’s in Montana. [read post]