Search for: "Buckman v. Buckman"
Results 361 - 375
of 375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 2:37 pm
See Cruz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Buckman preemption comes to mind. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
., Mean v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
That started to change with Buckman Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am
Young v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Maybe our motto here at DDLaw should be “we read law review articles so you don’t have to. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty)… [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:46 pm
In Baron v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
Daum v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) (repeating this holding in the context of the FDCA), and especially Buckman Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:30 am
We have not posted for a while—that day job can really get in the way sometimes—so we agreed to tackle the ridiculously long decision in Christiansen v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 5:49 am
By Emily Yan One year ago, on January 12, 2024, the Department of the Interior (DOI) implemented historic updates to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA).[1] These updates aim to close loopholes in the original regulation that allowed for a glacial rate of repatriation. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:47 pm
** FDA concludes its study on “Evaporated Cane Juice” – issues guidance that it is a misleading description for mere Sugar… [read post]
