Search for: "Bullet v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 1,405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2013, 6:34 am by Vanessa Schoenthaler
The new C&DIs are summarized below (in seventeen bullet points): When to make the disqualification determination … An issuer must determine whether it is subject to bad actor disqualification under Rule 506(d) any time it is offering or selling securities in reliance on Rule 506. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:18 pm by Steven Siegler
Your former employer's failure to register with or obtain a license from the State could be the "silver bullet" to help you quickly and successfully resolve your case. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am by Christine Corcos
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Madrid “that no seizure occurred when officers with the New Mexico State Police shot Roxanne Torres twice in the back, because their bullets did not actually stop her from getting away. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:03 am by Peter Spiro - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Filmmaker Overcomes Supreme Court Setback to Pursue North Carolina for Stealing Footage — Eriq Gardner has the full story about the somewhat remarkable development in Allen v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Jeffrey Bellin
Discussion The basic test for identifying a Fourth Amendment seizure comes from Justice Potter Stewart’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:24 am
Therefore, the subject firearm constitutes contraband, and its return would be improper (see Sea Lar Trading Co. v Michael, 94 AD2d 309, 315-316 [1983]; People v Didonna 124 Misc 872 [1925])." [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:05 am by PaulKostro
If someone negligently discharges a firearm from across the State line, intentionally directing the bullet into New Jersey, we have little doubt that such an act satisfies the dictates of International Shoe Co. v. [read post]