Search for: "Burgess v. Burgess"
Results 361 - 380
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
O’Brien and Burgess (08-1569) Argued: Feb. 23, 2010 Issue: Whether the mandatory minimum sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 6:36 am
By Andrew DelaneyKellogg v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:06 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm
It’s been a long two years since the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 8:14 am
By Daniel RichardsonDaniels v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
The Evan Law blog has a summary of the recent decision Allen v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
See Konop v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:43 am
[D057091] In Mark T. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am
In a CNN interview after Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, Collins told Jake Tapper that she “would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
See Konop v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Legal Times
Oral argument in the whistleblower case of Allison Engine Company v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:52 pm
See Lewis v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:58 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:37 am
By Michael TarrantState v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm
See, e.g., Burgess v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Richard Burgess, Am. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
A search of reported family judgments for the term polygraph brought up only one hit : F v Y (ABDUCTION: ACQUIESCENCE) [2014] 2 FLR 875 (HHJ Horowitz QC sitting as a HCJ), a case in which there is a single reference to a polygraph test taken by a Russian father, apparently in another jurisdiction, but it does not appear the test was adduced in evidence. [read post]
