Search for: "Bush v. Texas" Results 361 - 380 of 776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2013, 7:17 am by Allison Trzop
Goldstein, P.C., the firm also represented the respondents in Bush v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am by Marissa Miller
 Bush still would have won the presidency. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am by Conor McEvily
Briefly: Court watchers continue to comment on retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recent remarks to the Chicago Tribune in which she expressed doubts about the Court’s cert. grant in Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
University of Texas at Austin with Schuette v Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, two cases involving different aspects of race-based affirmative action. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
In an interview with the editorial board of The Chicago Tribune, retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor expressed doubts about whether the Court should have granted review in Bush v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 She has made a series of public comments lately critical of such sweeping decisions; they go too far too fast says Ginsburg.A less judicially active approach in the Roe v Wade would have been strike down the Texas law outlawing abortion, but leaving the broader constitutional questions to be determined on a state-by-state basis. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:33 am by Josh Douglas
 For example, some states send these disputes to their regular judicial process (as in Bush v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am by JB
Last week I attended a splendid conference organized by Sandy Levinson and held at the University of Texas. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:34 am by Lyle Denniston
Bush, had given Guantanamo Bay detainees a constitutional right to challenge their confinement. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 7:59 am by Allison Trzop
At a speech last night in Naples, Florida, retired Justice John Paul Stevens touched on a variety of topics that included Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:37 am by davidharrisauthor
Bush, finding that habeas corpus applied to detainees at Guantanamo Bay, and that the Military Commissions Act was an unconstitutional suspension of the right to habeas corpus; and Texas v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm by ALeonard
Texas (2003) would justify ignoring Baker, but Judge Jones was not willing to do so. [read post]