Search for: "CAMPBELL v. CAMPBELL"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
[The top 24 teams argued Torres v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 5:58 am
(Google LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Supreme Court explained in Campbell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
Campbell, 77, of Bulverde, died June 30, 2020. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
Campbell v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:34 pm
The opinion also has some nuggets for other fair use - discussion of transformation and art, definition of markets for determining harm, another reaffirmation of Campbell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 12:53 pm
Yusuf and U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
This year the competition focuses on Torres v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 7:30 pm
Climate change is the single greatest existential threat facing Canada. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am
Reisch Another Politician Unconstitutionally Censored Constituents on Twitter–Campbell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
CA) and Monsanto v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm
Roberts included the same citation in his dissent from Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:35 am
Further, New York courts have held that a corporation’s attorney represents only the corporate entity, not its officers or directors (Campbell v McKeon, 75 AD3d 479, 480-481 [1st Dept 20 I OJ). [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am
In Matter of Austin ZZ v Aimee A, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 624156, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Thus, “‘when it comes to Indian affairs, state courts are courts of limited jurisdiction'” (Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d at 296, quoting Bowen v Doyle, 880 FSupp 99, 114 [WD NY], affd 230 F3d 525 [2d Cir]). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am
Normal service looks to have been resumed following the Court of Appeal judgment in IPCom v Vodafone [2021] EWCA Civ 205, in which Arnold LJ reversed a first instance finding by Recorder Douglas Campbell QC that Vodafone was entitled to a defence of Crown use in respect of certain acts which infringed an IPCom patent, as well as providing some interesting commentary on the application of the de minimis infringement defence. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 10:32 am
In Brown v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:54 am
Author Goodtiming8871 Licence CC BY=SA 4,-Source Wikipedia Wireless Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justice Lewison, Lady Justice Asplin and Lord Justice Arnold) IPCom GmbH & Co Kg v Vodafone Group Plc and others [2021] EWCA Civ 205 (19 Feb 2021)This was an appeal by both sides against the judgment of Mr Recorder Campbell QC in IPcom GmbH & Co Kg v Vodafone Group Plc and others [2020] EWHC [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:08 pm
See, e.g., Campbell v. [read post]
