Search for: "CLEMENTS v. THE STATE"
Results 361 - 380
of 725
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2018, 12:25 pm
Solicitor General Paul Clement is the counsel of record. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 8:18 am
Bush and Al Odah v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Clement v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:00 am
***In the Waymo v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
Christopher may revisit the problematic case of Auer v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
” As part of the same discussion, Paul Clement debates whether the Court’s decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am
Clement. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:24 pm
State Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony – People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
WEA and Washington v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:52 pm
”[5] Clement v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:04 am
A state Supreme Court justice observed that New York State's public policy prohibits discrimination against persons who have committed a crime who have been rehabilitated. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm
We have a wealth of varying viewpoints on AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
” Leah Litman analyzes yesterday’s argument in Shular v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Briefly: At the New York Times, Kate Murphy interviews Paul Clement about his favorite movies, blogs, and brand of cycling shorts. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 7:51 am
ShareThe current Supreme Court is undoubtedly pro-arbitration – but after Monday’s oral argument in Morgan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 10:02 pm
In Rasul v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm
What follows are my impressions of the oral argument that took place in Pacific Operators Offshore v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 9:51 am
He supports his argument with reference to the case of Opremreh v. [read post]
