Search for: "CORN v. STATE"
Results 361 - 380
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 8:12 am
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:36 am
Patient Must be Informed of Risks In 1995 the Supreme Court of Canada decided in Hollis v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:46 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia last week struck down the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)’s Position Limits for Futures and Swaps final rule and interim final rule in International Swaps and Derivatives Association v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am
” The FDA opinion letter stated that the refiners failed to “provide sufficient grounds for the agency to authorize ‘corn sugar’ as an alternate common or usual name for HFCS. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In Arakelian v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 4:51 pm
Producers of table sugar from cane beets stated Lanham Act false advertising claims by alleging that member companies of the Corn Refiners Association (CRA) made advertising claims that high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is “natural” and should be referred to as “corn sugar,” as well as claims that HFCS is nutritionally and metabolically equivalent to other sugars, the federal district court in Los Angeles ruled has ruled.The CRA member… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
Circuit opinion in the controversial E15 (15 ethanol mix with gasoline) split decision in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:41 am
Corn v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Corning Inc., 496 F. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:46 am
Despite the corn refiner’s finest PR attempts and surely astronomical legal bills, High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) does NOT grow in the ground. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
For example, in Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:42 am
Astiana v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:06 am
This discussion focuses on the federal Sherman Act, but the California Cartwright Act (and many other states’ laws) is largely similar. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm
Circuit also dismissed a petition for review in National Chicken Council v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:56 am
Defendant Heart Attack Grill (HAG) in Jack Lebewohl et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
Written by Susan Neuberger Weller On July 6, 2012, in Lebewohl v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm
Circuit in the case of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm
Circuit in the case of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
