Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2020, 11:34 am
Appeal docketed No. 19-35281, May 3, 2019); Wallace v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:00 pm
This issue has been addressed by courts of appeal in the analogous context of California's prevailing wage law. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:12 am
California does not apply and neither does the 9th Cir’s decision in US v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
Windsor appealed the trial court’s denial of the prescriptive easement; Shadow appealed the trial court’s order denying its attorneys’ fees motion. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
Regents of the Univ. of Calif., Jan. 13, 2016, California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District More Blog Entries: Florida’s No-Fault Car Insurance System to End? [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
The opinion provides this interesting distillation of California law on the subject: The California Courts of Appeal have construed Discover Bank as providing for a three-part inquiry in order to determine whether a class action waiver in a consumer contract is unconscionable. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:54 am
Although there are certain exceptions, such as one where the government may require disclosure of such information pursuant to a criminal investigation, California’s First District Court of Appeal in Facebook v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:54 pm
Apple withdrew its cross-appeal, so the only party still fighting for an improvement is Samsung. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:12 am
A split federal appeals court ordered the cross’s removal from the current property. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:39 pm
In a cross-appeal, the Edwards plaintiff challenged the district court’s decision to reject the plaintiff’s requested 1.5x fee multiplier. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:28 pm
In upholding the procedure permitted by the Trial Court, the Court of Appeal also cited California Rules of Court, rule 3.767 (formerly Rule 1857, before the excellent idea of rules with decimal points). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated Wilson’s decision, giving the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint in light of the ATS-related developments of Kiobel v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
California. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:56 pm
In that case, Cross v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:50 pm
(California Court of Appeal, June 30, 2023, Wong v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
”) California v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:49 am
Los Angeles County, California, Petitioner v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 2:03 am
Basil, 202 N.J. 570, 591 (2010) (quoting California v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:35 pm
The Court of Appeal rejected that argument, citing its earlier opinion in Gober v. [read post]
