Search for: "Cable v. Cable"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2020, 2:15 am
The likelihood of confusion must be assessed globally, by taking into account the relevant public’s perception of the signs and goods or services in question and all factors relevant to the circumstances of the case, in particular the interdependence between the similarity of the signs and that of the goods or services covered (T-162/01, Laboratorios RTB v OHIM).The relevant territory was the territory covered by the international registration, namely the Benelux countries, Germany,… [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
By allowing no inquiry into any conduct preceding the demonstration except to identify “actual participants,” the Board disallowed highly relevant inquiry into identification of those deserving of discipline (Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Google Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
Indiana Municipalities’ Franchise Fee Lawsuit Against Online Video Providers Remanded to State Court
23 Nov 2020, 10:29 am
Order, City of Fishers v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:18 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 8:22 am
(Report and Order) The FCC and NAB submitted their briefs this week to the Supreme Court in the FCC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
(EFF) Net Neutrality 2005 National Cable & Telecommunications Assn v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:44 am
Cable News Network, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
“Puerto Rico ha sido víctima. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:39 am
Real Foods Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
Donner Technology, LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Field v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:11 am
DOJ had sought a preliminary injunction but the court agreed to a request by all parties to stay the case after California agreed not to enforce the law pending final resolution of Mozilla v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
As noted by Justice Perram in the Capic v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
There were also 10 denials of institution, nine of which were on Section 314 non-merits grounds; the FitBit filings against Phillips patents were denied institution over Fintiv based on an International Trade Commission (ITC) action Phillips initiated, and a number of parallel petitions filed by Comcast were denied consideration under the Board’s July 2019 Trial Practice Guide Update “ranking” requirement (which was itself based on an earlier Comcast v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 12:42 pm
Approximately 150 couples have been included in the lawsuit known as Milligan et al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
In Mohammad v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:51 am
McCandless v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
FIU College of Law– Hannibal Travis, Professor of Law, FIU College of Law, presents today, The United States v. [read post]
