Search for: "California v. Gonzalez" Results 361 - 380 of 425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Gonzalez-Terrazas, No. 07-50375 A sentence based on a guilty plea conviction for unlawful reentry of an alien after removal is vacated and the case remanded for resentencing where the district court erred in applying a 16 level crime of violence enhancement based on the defendant's prior conviction under California Penal Code section 459 for residential burglary. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:00 am by Florian Mueller
There are constantly new developments around Apple's antitrust woes, such as in the Apple Pay and access-to-NFC-chip class action in the Northern District of California (see the previous post, Credit card issuers oppose Apple's motion to stay discovery in Apple Pay antitrust case, cite recent decision by same federal judge in AliveCor v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:48 am by Eric
Third, a few words about three recent California anti-SLAPP cases have caught my attention (at some point I'll also blog separately about the DC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 11, 2008 Dutil v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm by Florian Mueller
In this regard, they've made concessions lately--concession that in my view don't go far enough to address competition concerns, but which nevertheless represent (limited) progress.On June 10, 2022, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California formally approved (PDF) a class-action settlement between small app developers and Apple. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 Geert van Calster, Elsemiek Apersand Alejandro Gonzalez Arreaza, K.U. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
"[A] party's awareness of the requirements of the CSSA is not the dispositive consideration under the statute" (Lepore v. [read post]