Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 361 - 380
of 31,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2010, 5:51 pm
TiVo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 10:50 am
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court clarified many of the general requirements for meal and rest periods under California law. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 10:14 am
However, on February 24, 2023, a California Court of Appeal held that the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act (HWHF) also allows for an employee to bring a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claim against their employer (Wood v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 2:33 pm
In a one page order yesterday, the Ninth Circuit issued an injunction pending appeal in Pickup v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:50 pm
The California Attorney General today filed a notice of appeal in the Jones v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:54 pm
In Narayan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:21 pm
Although the ruling will likely have little value for a tax attorney in South Florida, it is interesting from a constitutional and tax law perspective. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
Renne Public Law Group (“RPLG”) recently prevailed in the California Supreme Court on behalf of the Los Angeles County Assessor in Prang v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 10:34 am
On November 30, 2016, the California Court of Appeal issued its opinion in Driscoll v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
On June 18, 2015, the Ninth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion in Lemus v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 6:18 am
On January 14, 2021, the California Supreme Court held in Vazquez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:23 am
The California Supreme Court’s opinion in Howard v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
Hixson summarized the applicable law as follows: In Bowen v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Here, the fairgrounds were rented by a private party for the festival, so the federal claim doesn't succeed.But as you may know, California has the Pruneyard doctrine, which is broader than federal law and allows access to private properties (e.g., shopping malls) under California's Free Speech Clause. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:46 am
On December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court overturned a court of appeal opinion finding that insurance claims adjusters are categorically “non-exempt” employees in Harris v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Arthur Andersen regarding non-competition agreements In 2008, the California Supreme Court ruled on the enforceability of non-competition agreements under California law in Edwards v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
In Brack v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:36 am
[JURIST] Lawyers representing the city of San Francisco submitted a brief [text, PDF] on Monday arguing that California's ban on same-sex marriages [JURIST news archive], better known as Proposition 8 [text; JURIST news archive], is irrational under California state law. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:00 am
Gay Law Students Assn. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 7:40 pm
This is not the only litigation involving California gun laws. [read post]
