Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 361 - 380
of 34,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
In a 2011 decision, Sullivan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
” Rhode v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:51 pm
TiVo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
And that has been the law in California for a long time. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 10:50 am
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court clarified many of the general requirements for meal and rest periods under California law. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 10:34 am
On November 30, 2016, the California Court of Appeal issued its opinion in Driscoll v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:21 pm
Although the ruling will likely have little value for a tax attorney in South Florida, it is interesting from a constitutional and tax law perspective. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 10:14 am
However, on February 24, 2023, a California Court of Appeal held that the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act (HWHF) also allows for an employee to bring a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claim against their employer (Wood v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 6:18 am
On January 14, 2021, the California Supreme Court held in Vazquez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:10 pm
Keith Paul Bishop reports: California Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued her ruling yesterday on the parties' respective motions for summary judgment in Crest v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 2:33 pm
In a one page order yesterday, the Ninth Circuit issued an injunction pending appeal in Pickup v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:54 pm
In Narayan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:50 pm
The California Attorney General today filed a notice of appeal in the Jones v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
Renne Public Law Group (“RPLG”) recently prevailed in the California Supreme Court on behalf of the Los Angeles County Assessor in Prang v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
On June 18, 2015, the Ninth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion in Lemus v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Here, the fairgrounds were rented by a private party for the festival, so the federal claim doesn't succeed.But as you may know, California has the Pruneyard doctrine, which is broader than federal law and allows access to private properties (e.g., shopping malls) under California's Free Speech Clause. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Arthur Andersen regarding non-competition agreements In 2008, the California Supreme Court ruled on the enforceability of non-competition agreements under California law in Edwards v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:43 am
In a not-very-surprising development, the California Supreme Court accepted review of the Brinker v. [read post]
