Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
World Champ Tech LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am
People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:06 am
The Saul Zaentz Company dba Tolkien Enterprises v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
District Court in the Central District of California. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:53 am
KG v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 4:42 pm
Mark Moore. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
” Fittingly, the legal wins this week show a marked improvement since 2013—with a criminal trial that protects and prevents further victims and a civil case that shows how far survivors can go when they exercise their rights.Federal Judge Ruled it Was Reasonable to Conclude That Visa Facilitated Criminal ActivityOn Friday, July 29, Visa suffered a major setback as a defendant in a case (Fleites v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
Many observers—including Epic CEO Tim Sweeney—have marked this as an unmitigated loss for Epic. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Armitage v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:27 am
Nelson & Kennard, 2014 DJDAR 587 (Jan. 16, 2014).And speaking of "Kennards," Texan Mark Pulliam, in Restoring the Rule of Law in California, makes "a few observations about the state of the legal system in California," and suggests that the Governor fill Justice Kennard's seat with "a proven jurist with a sterling reputation," LA Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl.Finally, for those seeking "pure" appellate materials only, appellate specialist Joan Wolff offers How… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
Zero Motorcycles, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:33 pm
In Matsunoki Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
FERC.In California v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
The defendant is an Amazon merchant allegedly selling items bearing the mark. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:52 pm
Castillo v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:03 am
The present opinion marks perhaps the first extensive foray into the issue of screening by a California federal court since Kirk. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 9:33 pm
”This, the Ninth Circuit found, was based on a misreading of Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:15 am
Having read Professor Stephen Bainbridge's post about the origins of the judicial doctrine that directors must act on an informed basis, I passed along a reference to the California Supreme Court's in Fox v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
The lawsuit was filed in the Central District of California.[3] Yuga contends that Ryder Ripps engaged in deceptive practices aimed at duping consumers into acquiring a copycat NFT collection resembling the original Bored Ape Yacht Club images. [read post]
