Search for: "California v. Scott" Results 361 - 380 of 1,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2019, 9:06 pm by Edward Hale
The agency, however, has reclassified FDA-Approved drugs that contain less than 0.1 percent CBD as Schedule V drugs—an apparent carve out for Epidolex. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of  "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the… [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
In Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm by Richard Hunt
A third of the reported ADA and FHA decisions in the last three weeks involved a single plaintiff, Scott Johnson. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
There were reports on the Transparency Project Blog, the Himsworth Scott website, the BBC and the Guardian. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Science, Scholarship, and Policymaking Scott Burris, Temple University, Science, Interdisciplinarity, and Health Law Scholarship Kevin Outterson, Boston University, Bad Science Leads to Bad Legal Scholarship Joanna Sax, California Western School of Law, Consumer Perceptions of Risk in Various Areas of Biotechnology C. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Since Brookings published the report in May 2016, Alabama, Arkansas, California, Texas, and Utah have all criminalized sextortion. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm by Richard Hunt
Mar. 6, 2019) dismissed a claim under California’s Unruh Act that was based on the same facts as the plaintiff’s claim under the ADA. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]