Search for: "Call v. Superior Court"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2013, 5:46 am
Upon appeal, Curtis cited Dowling v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 1:31 pm
A recent decision of the Delaware Superior Court featured an unusual ruling in Delaware: A motion to disqualify counsel was granted based on a conflict of interest under Rule of Professional Conduct 1.9, relating to prior representation of a client. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
The Decision and Its Implications In a decision released last week, Justice MacDonnell of the Ontario Superior Court upheld the production order. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 2:31 pm
In V.B. and C.B. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:25 am
Thus, it affirmed the Superior Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
In a lengthy, mostly-unpublished opinion filed on August 14, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the superior court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging the Parkmerced Development Project. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
The case, Bertrand v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 11:37 am
Superior Court, and Troester v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
Superior Court, in which only Justice Liu joined. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 11:24 am
The first is the decision about two decades ago by the Superior Court and Commonwealth Court to issue non-precedential opinions. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
Superior Court, supra. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:01 am
See Christopher Legg et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
In Fulton County Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 3:45 pm
These issues were met head-on by Superior Court Judge Eugene Strassberger, of Allegheny County, in M.E.V. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:00 am
Superior Court, 20 Cal. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:18 am
Call 714-937-2020. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
The recent decision of Justice Fuerst in R v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am
This defense was first found to be invalid in the Superior Court case of Pringle v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Jackson (election contest): https://electioncases.osu.edu/case/ward-v-jackson/ From the Maricopa County Superior Court Judge’s decision: “The Court finds no misconduct, no fraud, and no effect on the outcome of the election. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
Our friends at Covington, specifically Michael Imbroscio, sent us a decision by the Quebec Superior Court rejecting certification (what they call “authorization” in Quebec) of a proposed class action alleging that Accutane (isotretinoin) caused inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in Lebrasseur v. [read post]
