Search for: "Castle v. Castle" Results 361 - 380 of 1,077
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:43 am by Joanna L. Grossman
Women’s health is under attack—here, there, and everywhere.Domestically, we see Trump’s pick of a Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, who he suspects might vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:34 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
Tearing down the castle, and showing the faults in one’s case is an easier task than building it up. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:21 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and Daniel Barber
NAVALMAR UK LTD V KALE MADEN HAMMADDELER SANAYI VE TICART AS [2017] EWHC 116 (COMM) – The MV “ARUNDEL CASTLE” In this case the Commercial Court considered the meaning of “within port limits” in the context of a charterparty on an amended Gencon 94 form which provided that: “[Notice of readiness] to be tendered at both ends even by cable/telex/telefax on vessels arrival at load/disch ports within port limits. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:12 pm by Stephanie Farrior
Early on we tussled over the role of international law in addressing violence against women by non-state actors, but when it came time to file an amicus brief on the subject with the US Supreme Court in Town of Castle Rock v. [read post]
The Trump Court may undo this, and overrule the gay marriage case (Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Bell Canada, 2017 FC 6 https://t.co/Z80SOcWu44 -> Big win for Bell in major patent case, Mediatube Corp. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This is the point, in the words of the Virginia Supreme Court in McGrath v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
She is the coauthor of Inside the Castle: Law and the Family in 20th Century America (Princeton University Press 2011), co-winner of the 2011 David J. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
On the other hand, a period measured in years may in some cases be appropriate: see, for example, Parker v Parker [2003] EWHC 1846 (Ch), where the Earl of Macclesfield was held entitled to two years to leave the ancestral home, Shirburn Castle, which he had been occupying as a licensee for some ten years. [read post]