Search for: "Cave v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2011, 10:45 am
The California Supreme Court is no exception and made this most recent decision based off the US Supreme Court Case, United State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Or will the Court cave? [read post]
ACCA reportedly denies petition for extraordinary relief arising from 5th Stryker Brigade Article 32
8 Jan 2011, 8:59 am
Phil Cave’s blog notes this military.com story reporting that ACCA yesterday denied the petition for extraordinary relief arising from the United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm
S is for State Farm, which challenged the constitutionality of Canadian privacy law. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:50 pm
The government caved. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:01 pm
CDR Cave will be a guest; Colonel Sullivan plans to participate as well, although he may be a little late calling in. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am
If you missed last night’s interview with Colonel Sullivan, retired CDR Phil Cave, and Fogbow blogger Mata Mari, you can still find it online here: blogtalkradio. 1057: The members are now deliberating on sentence. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:56 pm
Note: Colonel Sullivan will be on blogtalkradio again at 2100 hours tonight with retired commander Phil Cave and Fogbow blogger Mata Mari to discuss today’s events. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:32 am
If you missed RealityCheck’s interview last night with Colonel Sullivan, retired CDR Phil Cave (whose rank I inadvertently omitted in previous posts — mea culpa), and Fogbow blogger Mata Mari, you can still find it online here: blogtalkradio. 0945: Update from the colonel: the defense rested without presenting any evidence. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:07 pm
If true, it would be difficult to see how the prosecution could secure a conviction in light of United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
Mammoth Cave Prod. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:24 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:01 am
Hands-free control of your smart phone not only makes good sense, it is the law in more and more states. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:26 am
I won't quite say that the brain-in-a-vat issue is exactly raised in the Supreme Court case of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:29 pm
" Authors of legislation rarely cite to case law in statutes, except when they wish to legislatively reverse specific cases (e.g., the Civil Rights Act of 1991, statutorily reversing Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:15 am
dissent in MD v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:54 pm
Highlights this week included: Near final ACTA text released – shows US caved in on Internet provisions (Public Knowledge) (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) Texas jury orders Apple to pay $625.5M for infringing document streaming patents belonging to Mirror Worlds (Maier & Maier) (IPBiz) (Blawg IT) (EDTexweblog.com) (ArsTechnica) CAFC: Compliance with industry standards can be used to show patent infringement: Fujitsu et al v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:26 am
Medina and United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:58 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
