Search for: "Chancellor v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 1,354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2019, 8:39 am by Carl Neff
 Carl is admitted in the State of Delaware and regularly practices before the Delaware Court of Chancery, with an emphasis on shareholder disputes. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:00 am by Race to the Bottom
The Delaware Chancery court, per Vice Chancellor Glasscock, issued an opinion in Vintage Rodeo Parent, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
Which brings us to a noteworthy bench ruling last week by Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III in Dodelson v AC Holdco, Inc., C.A. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the notorious 1959 Roncarelli v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:39 am by SHG
Absent mandatory language in the regs, or court decisions like Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State is cited in the following article: Heather Elliott, Gorsuch v. the Administrative State, 70 ALA. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:26 am by Peter Mahler
Vice Chancellor Glasscock’s recent valuation opinion in Smith v Promontory Financial Group, LLC, Mem. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:31 am by Carl Neff
On April 17, 2019, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a significant appraisal decision from the Delaware Court of Chancery in Verition Partners Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:35 am by Matthew D. Donovan
A recent post-trial decision out of Delaware’s Court of Chancery, Personal Touch Holding Corp. v Glaubach, brings home this lesson with similar colloquial color. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Noting that Supreme Court had directed DOE, in an order issued in May 2013, to follow its own stated procedure by accepting the rescission letter and reinstating Respondent, subject to the Chancellor's approval as provided in the regulation, the Appellate Division held that DOE's delay "was unacceptably long and effectively operated to subvert the court's order. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Noting that Supreme Court had directed DOE, in an order issued in May 2013, to follow its own stated procedure by accepting the rescission letter and reinstating Respondent, subject to the Chancellor's approval as provided in the regulation, the Appellate Division held that DOE's delay "was unacceptably long and effectively operated to subvert the court's order. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
In Re Beech, Saint v. [read post]