Search for: "Chapman v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm by SJM
The couple were placed on the waiting list for rehousing and they were eventually relocated to suitable accommodation at the end of 2007.The Court noted that there was no right under Article 8 to be provided with a home (Chapman v UK) except in the limited circumstances where an applicant’s serious personal circumstances created a positive obligation on the State to act. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm by SJM
The couple were placed on the waiting list for rehousing and they were eventually relocated to suitable accommodation at the end of 2007.The Court noted that there was no right under Article 8 to be provided with a home (Chapman v UK) except in the limited circumstances where an applicant’s serious personal circumstances created a positive obligation on the State to act. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:38 am
While the letter is the second by the House Republican leaders asking the Governor to join Kentucky as they appeal the case of Baze v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by Marissa Miller
” Additional coverage focused on the Court’s opinion last Monday in Florence v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
At Real Clear Policy, Nathan Chapman argues that Justice Neil Gorsuch’s separate concurrence in Sessions v. [read post]
  The law was re-iterated in the Fourth Appellate Department, which covers part of upstate New York just this year, in 2015 in the case of Matter of Barone v Chapman-Cleland, 129 A.D.3d 1578 (2015) which stated that biology or adoption under our current statutes define what a parent is and stated that any change of this needs to come from the legislature. [read post]