Search for: "Charles v. United States Government" Results 361 - 380 of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2015, 8:20 am by Ilya Somin
Here is the wording I drafted for the amendment: Section 1: Private property may not be taken by the United States or by any State except for a public use. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, as the U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 7:28 am by Harold O'Grady
Before being appointed to the Supreme Court by President Lyndon Johnson, Marshall was a lawyer for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Federal Judge (1961-1965), and Solicitor General of the United States (1965-1966). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm by Robert Liles
  This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around… [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
The same blog carries a note by JIPLP editorial board member Charles Macedo, with three of his colleagues, on "trade mark tacking" and the recent US Supreme Court ruling in Hana v Hana. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
 "The Los Angeles Review of Books reviews Clark Stoeckley's  The United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Mosvick
Borden, a case arising out of the “Dorr Rebellion” in Rhode Island which decided Congress, not the federal courts, had the ultimate say over whether a state government was republican for purposes of Article IV). [read post]