Search for: "Child v. Social Security Administration"
Results 361 - 380
of 543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
In Mercredi v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:39 am
The question in this case was whether twins who were conceived in vitro after the death of their biological father were eligible for Social Security child survivor benefits. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
Koch v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:28 am
Karen applied for social security benefits for the twins, but the Social Security Administration ("SSA") denied her application. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:34 am
She subsequently applied to the Social Security Administration for surviving child's insurance benefits. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
The claim was rejected by the Social Security Administration because Florida law stated that a child could inherit through intestate succession only if conceived during the decedent's lifetime. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 10:38 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) defers to state law when deciding whether to award claims for benefits to heirs conceived posthumously in the absence of a will. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:33 am
Congress, it said, believed at the time it passed DOMA that it would reduce tax revenues and raise Social Security payments — arguments that, it said, would satisfy such a minimal standard of review. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:19 pm
The mother applied for social security for the twins, and the issue came up of if the children are "children" for the purposes of social security. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:53 am
Capato applied for surviving child’s insurance benefits on behalf of the twins, the Social Security Administration (SSA) denied her benefits. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:53 am
Capato applied for surviving child’s insurance benefits on behalf of the twins, the Social Security Administration (SSA) denied her benefits. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:04 am
Justice Ginsberg wrote that the Social Security Administration was within its rights to deny benefits to a child who was conceived and born after her biological father had died. because Congress had completed its definition by reference to state intestacy law, which this child could not meet. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:00 am
Capato, Respondent mother of the twins applied for Social Security survivors benefits for the twins, relying on 42 U.S.C. 416(e) of the Social Security Act, which defined child to mean, inter alia, “the child or legally adopted child of an [insured] individual. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:00 am
Capato, Respondent mother of the twins applied for Social Security survivors benefits for the twins, relying on 42 U.S.C. 416(e) of the Social Security Act, which defined child to mean, inter alia, “the child or legally adopted child of an [insured] individual.” [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm
A primary drafter of the Bolivian Social Security pension privatization law, Ms. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:27 pm
In an unanimous opinion by Justice Ginsburg, the Court sided squarely with the Social Security Administration, thus giving Chevron deference to a federal agency’s interpretation for the seventh time in the past five years. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:33 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg announced the decision, which agreed with the Social Security Administration (SSA) [official website] that an IVF child conceived after death could only inherit benefits if guaranteed by state intestacy law:Just as the Act generally refers... [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:38 pm
The Social Security Administration (SSA) denied the claim initially and upon reconsideration. [read post]
