Search for: "Childs v. Gross"
Results 361 - 380
of 873
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2015, 12:43 pm
The legislation was adopted to remove any uncertainty caused by the decision in Gerard v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:54 pm
" In summary, by making the extent to which a child may be educated a function of the real property wealth of the school district in which that child happens to reside, or the school district in which that child's parents are able to afford to live, the State has violated the democratic and egalitarian intention that underlies the Education Article, substituting in its stead an impermissible reliance on the accident of real property wealth as the ultimate… [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 10:07 am
Additional Resources: Nissan Motor Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
McBride v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:58 am
The bill also would expand coverage of California’s school activities leave (Family School Partnership Act, Labor Code Section 230.8) to include day care facilities and cover child care provider emergencies, and the finding, enrolling, or reenrolling of a child in a school or day care, and would extend protections to an employee who is a step-parent or foster parent or who stands in loco parentis to a child. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:50 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Family Opinions Body: AC36333 - Hendricks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:30 am
BOOTES V. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
She did not report these payments as gross income. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:54 pm
In Sinclair v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:16 am
If you mix in other circumstances (caring for a disabled child or several minor children), the effect is even more dramatic. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
Elliott Gross. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
Elliott Gross. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:56 am
Specifically, the parties agreed: “No matter defendant’s annual gross income, at no time shall monthly support be lower than $5,000, except after the emancipation of [the parties’ youngest child] when the child support component may be reduced”. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:52 pm
The plaintiff cites but one Connecticut decision--and research has failed to reveal any others--DeGolyer v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
Gross, June 29, 2015, 5-4. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:46 am
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:46 am
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:07 pm
But yesterday, the Massachusetts high court unanimously reversed, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 11:19 am
See what happened in Johnson: Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:45 am
King v. [read post]
