Search for: "Christopher W., Matter of"
Results 361 - 380
of 508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm
FACTS: Christopher Pearce, 38, was married and had five children. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:34 am
In Owen, Monroe County Surrogate and Acting Supreme Court Justice Christopher S. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:37 am
Tracy Christopher King, a/k/a “T.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
” in a gravelly Boston accent full of brio – so I always enjoyed any encounter with him, and found it the most natural thing in the world to talk about matters great and small. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:58 am
According to a common argument made today, however, that greater “efficiency” in jus in bello considerations thereby makes resort to force by the United States too easy, as a jus ad bellum matter, and indeed possibly “inefficient. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
Josh Gerstein, writing Under the Radar, reports that the Justice Department has released portions of a detailed legal analysis from 2004 of President George W. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm
Christopher Booker has written a subsequent piece at the Telegraph. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
(Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Interactive Life Forms LLC – ILF brings patent suit in W D Texas against more than 20 companies concerning sex toy (Patentology) Interactive Life Forms LLC – ILF files new 337 complaint regarding devices containing elastomeric gel (ITC 337 Law Blog) Life Technologies – Midland settles with Life Technologies in fluorescence probe infringement suit (Patent Docs) LSI Corp – ALJ Charneski issues public… [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm
Francis W. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
Josh Gerstein, writing Under the Radar, reports that the Justice Department has released portions of a detailed legal analysis from 2004 of President George W. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 5:31 am
W. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Samuel W. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 5:16 am
This interagency dispute spilled into the public when Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco and FBI Director Christopher Wray broke with the Biden administration to publicly oppose the law, both warning starkly that it “would make the public less safe from cyber threats. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Section 1237 was amended a final time through the Ronald W. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm
&Rikhof, Joseph 2013 Link International and Transnational Criminal Law Currie, Robert J. 2010 Link International Human Rights Law Freeman, Mark 2004 Link International Law: Doctrine, Practice, and Theory, Second Edition Currie, John H. et al. 2014 Link International Trade Law Johnson, Jon R. 1998 Link Joint Ventures: Legal and Business Perspectives Reiter, Barry J 1999 Link Jury Selection in Criminal Trials: Skills, Science and the Law Tanovich, David M. 1997 Link Labour and Employment Law in… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am
We’ve also posted the blog in the comments section of Christopher Booker’s opinion piece. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:21 am
If trust had a hologram for all of its forms -- honor, commitment, credulity, betrayal, reliance, and, confidence (harboring the "con" that playwright David Mamet has made his life's work) - that hologram would surely include images of the American Legal System. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
