Search for: "Citizens for Constitutional, et al. v. United States, et al."
Results 361 - 380
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Accordingly, the proposals provide for an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States and the corresponding obligation of the courts in all other Member States to transfer parallel litigation to the courts of the Member State where the arbitration takes place. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:55 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
” Branzburg claimed privilege both under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and various state statutory and constitutional provisions. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Skrobot, et al. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Skrobot, et al. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
Dix et al., McCormick on Evidence § 234 (6th ed. 2009)). [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:12 pm
That's certainly true at the Supreme Court.The case is United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
That mimics the general conversation a society has about the legal, civic, ethical and societal obligations of its citizens. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
: the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:00 pm
EMW WOMEN'S SURGICAL CENTER, ET AL. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:36 am
In contrast, the sovereign interest of the United States was not implicated: none of the defendants are U.S. citizens and the alleged conspiracy had nothing to do with the United States except for DEA’s manufactured nexus. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Just because the American people sometimes make choices that policymakers find distasteful, it does not mean that citizens don’t have good choices at their disposal. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 3:02 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:14 am
J 301 M323 [V. 2] A breviate of parliamentary papers, 1917-1939 / P. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
Perhaps one day decisions like Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:41 pm
Oumar Issa, et. al., SDNY, shows the three are still in custody and the case hasn't even gotten past the discovery phase to the filing of pre-trial motions.) [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:03 pm
Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, et al, No. 1:2016-cv-00932, (E.D. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
This is especially problematic given the increasing dominance and global reach of these large enterprises in the face of the expanding attempts of local courts and local laws to impose responsibilities on these social media giants to protect their citizens. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
For reasons of concision, I don't fully deal with the limitations in this post, but I will note two: first, determining what constitutes "false" information and acting on it at scale are non-trivial challenges. [read post]
