Search for: "Coca v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2007, 7:30 am
So if you wanted to see what the Coca-Cola wiki page looked like on Feb 10 of this year, go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
(Spicy IP) Manjal removed from trademark registry (Spicy IP) Israel Coca Cola’s trade secret – alcohol?! [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am by Kedar Bhatia
National Australia Bank (OT09), United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:30 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  As the Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:31 am by Tomassi Law Associates
United States, No. 09-1533, the court unanimously held that the term “cocaine base” in a federal law refers not only to crack cocaine but to all kinds of cocaine in a chemically basic form, including coca paste and freebase. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am by fjhinojosa
Brie Sherwin’s article Chocolate, Coca-Cola, and Fracturing Fluid: A Story of Unfettered Secrecy, Toxicology, and the Resulting Public Health Implications of Natural Gas Development is cited in the following article: Lisa A. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
The Kat was really excited at the thought that the small Black Sea state of Georgia was host to some high class copyright litigation -- but to his disappointment it turned out instead to be the other Georgia, home of Coca-Cola and Jimmy Carter. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:06 am by The Legal Blog
Earlier, the Supreme Court referred to Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:00 am by John Zarych
Similarly, cocaine is derived from the coca leaf (not to be confused with “cocoa” – the source of chocolate). [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]