Search for: "Com. v. Little, A." Results 361 - 380 of 556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
    BENTLEY for clothing: no unfair advantage taken of Bentley Motors – not this time anywayBentley Motors v Bentley 1962 O-117-17 (March 2017)Bentley 1962 (“B62”) had been selling BENTLEY branded clothing in the UK since at least 1998 (apparently with little success). [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:12 am by Kirk Jenkins
(Note: The following post was originally published on Law360.com on January 24, 2013.) [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
This can no longer be allowed in view of the comments in Bovemij Verzekeringen NV v Benelux Merkenbureau, Case C-108/05 [EUROPOLIS], which makes clear that the mark must be distinctive in the whole of the territory of the member state [Merpel would like a little clarification here: is this what Bovemij clearly established?]. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
Aug. 8, 2012) (“design claim is “at [its] core” a warning claim; Bartlett “offered little explanation for accepting the failure to withdraw theory”); Lashley v. [read post]