Search for: "Com. v. May" Results 361 - 380 of 3,197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm by Jessica Kroeze
Koleske, Editor, 1995, pages 23-25D6: BYK Additives & Instruments, Product Guide L-G 1, Paint Additives, February 2009D7: WO 2011/084380 A1.V. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am by skelly
However, this failure to update direct insurance procurement tax laws may literally prove costly, as illustrated under the recently decided New Jersey Tax Court case, Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Booking.com B.V., 19-46Issue: Whether, when the Lanham Act states generic terms may not be registered as trademarks, the addition by an online business of a generic top-level domain (“.com”) to an otherwise generic term can create a protectable trademark. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:05 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The Supreme Court decision in Gilham v Ministry of Justice3 held that PIDA protections can apply to holders of public office even without any formal contracts of employment. [read post]