Search for: "Commonwealth v. Wells, D."
Results 361 - 380
of 458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– Pacific Daily News, July 27, 2010 District Court of Guam Chief Judge Frances Tydingco-Gatewood approved a months-old consent decree between the federal government and Mobil Oil that requires the company to pay $2.4 million in penalties for allegedly violating the Clean Air Act on Guam and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
[The Atlantic] Judge Permits Virginia Health Care Law Challenge to Continue [Fox News] Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:59 pm
” [via Supreme Court of Washington Blog] Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:33 pm
The Commonwealth Court rejected all challenges to the act applying the reasoning of the Pa Supreme Court in Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm
In the Comment/Response Document, the Department also notes that Section 102.14(d)(2(v) provides a waiver for brownfield redevelopment projects from the new riparian buffer requirements. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
Florida, No 09-5327 (6/14/2010) “In a capital habeas matter, the Eleventh Circuit’s affirmance of the denial of petitioner’s habeas petition is reversed and remanded where: 1) 28 U.S.C. section 2244(d), the AEDPA statute of limitations, is subject to equitable tolling in appropriate cases, and the per se standard employed by the Eleventh Circuit was too rigid; and 2) the district court incorrectly rested its ruling not on a lack of extraordinary circumstances (which… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:46 pm
Commonwealth Land Title Ins. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
Check out Scott Greenfield's post on Berghuis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:24 pm
Do we really want to exempt Puerto Rico from Martin v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
(d) A family relationship. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
It must be remembered when acting for clients that theories are well and good, and they might apply in the case of the client, but they are theories. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:28 am
(The Court did so in Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Not clear that we need parody for a well-functioning marketplace. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
East Lynne Bd of Educ 604 F.Supp.2d 96, 53 IDELR 96 (D. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
Hakel, 870 P.2d 1224 (Colo. 1994) (reading two affidavits together as establishing probable cause where the second affidavit incorporated the first by reference); Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 7:49 pm
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
D’Arcy, 2010 Cal. [read post]
