Search for: "Community Services, Incorporated v. the United States" Results 361 - 380 of 799
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Steve Daines introduced legislation to establish such a board in April of last year, and his proposal is largely incorporated here. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
  Except within internaitonal organizations there is very little by way of standardization of the internaitonal law and norms that states (through through states economic actors and others) are expected to incorporate into their domestic legal orders. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Sharon Bradford Franklin
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
  In America, for example, several claims have been brought under the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), which gives federal courts power to hear civil cases brought by foreign citizens for injuries caused by actions “in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
And one in three people who had used a public service in the last 12 months said they had to pay a bribe (29 per cent). [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Lastly, Kaspersky claims that it has standing to assert Fifth Amendment due process rights because it has “substantial connections” to the United States based on its employment of 300 people in Massachusetts and its sales to customers and thus, comes under the framework announced in United States v. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]