Search for: "Concepcion v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 6:00 am
Concepcion. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:39 pm
(Link to the Judgement)The United States Supreme Court had to consider in AT & T v Concepcion if class action waivers in arbitration clauses were valid. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:30 am
Concepcion. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Concepcion. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:26 am
Concepcion, and Arthur Miller of NYU School of Law have letters to the editor in the New York Times, whose editorial board recently criticized the Court’s ruling that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that would require the availability of class proceedings. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:23 am
” Gun rights groups have filed an amicus brief in support of the federal government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:21 am
In March 2006, the Concepcions filed a complaint against AT&T in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am
According to Justice Stevens, the president acted “not merely to do justice and avenge Sept. 11,” but instead “to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm
A federal trial court, upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, struck down the AT&T arbitration clause as unconscionable under California law and allowed the plaintiffs to move forward against the company in a class action in federal court. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Eleventh Circuit wasted little time in applying AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:31 am
On April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) preempted California state contract law which courts had applied to invalidate arbitration agreements that did not permit class arbitration. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:18 am
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided in AT&T v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:23 pm
Keating, the Supreme Court held the FAA applies to state courts and is intended to preempt state anti-arbitration laws to the contrary, and in Circuit City Stores, Inc., v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Concepcion (April 27, 2011). [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:02 am
In a big win for employers, the United States Supreme Court held last week that, under the Federal Arbitration Act, an arbitration agreement can prohibit an individual from commencing or participating in a class action. [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:02 am
In a big win for employers, the United States Supreme Court held last week that, under the Federal Arbitration Act, an arbitration agreement can prohibit an individual from commencing or participating in a class action. [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:02 am
In a big win for employers, the United States Supreme Court held last week that, under the Federal Arbitration Act, an arbitration agreement can prohibit an individual from commencing or participating in a class action. [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:37 am
This year's United States Supreme Court term promises to be a blockbuster for class action law. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:00 pm
In AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
