Search for: "Concerning Application for Water Rights"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 7:42 am
On this theory, Member States should be able to take measures under Article XX(a), (b), or (g) to promote human rights or environmental concerns arising in other countries, even if those harms are not manifest in their own jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:45 am
" Such a standard, the Court held, "improperly waters down the fundamental requirements of Article III. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 2:17 pm
Plaintiff argued that establishing a right to withhold assessments – a condominium board’s only source of income – would make it even less likely that common areas would be repaired, but the Court observed that the same concern could be applied to multiunit rentals, where the defense was established. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:46 pm
(para. 32) The applicant appealed this judgment to the European Court of Human Rights under Article 10, Article 6 and Article 41 ECHR on the grounds that his conviction was made in the absence of evidence. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
In other words the appeal concerns an application for PII, not 54. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:45 am
And further stated: The prevalence of discrimination in Canadian laws and policies regarding the application of regulations on hazardous substances and wastes is clear. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 2:49 am
My contract states: “To notify each supplier of gas, electricity, water that the Tenancy has commenced by completing an application for a supply to the Premises in the name of the Tenant and not in the name of the Landlord. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:02 pm
” Where does this possible “constitutional right” come from? [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:21 pm
It is also in the interest of companies to protect human rights and the environment, in particular given the rising concern of consumers and investors regarding these topics. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
The applicants sought damages for breach of their ECHR rights. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
Waters Or International Waters? [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:25 am
” The Ninth Circuit’s ruling exhibits a strong concern that the Brulotte precedent impedes contract law by invalidating significant portions of otherwise enforceable contracts: We acknowledge our application of the Brulotte rule in this case arguably deprives Kimble of part of the benefit of his bargain based upon a technical detail that both parties regarded as insignificant at the time of the agreement. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 9:02 am
Recently, Public Citizen joined 25 global community organizations, labor unions, and Indigenous, environmental and human rights groups to raise concerns about the Consolidated Mining Standard Initiative—the mining industry’s latest attempt to self-regulate and greenwash its horrendous track record of human rights abuses and environmental destruction. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:31 pm
In addition, we are examining what fines or damages BP could be liable for under additional applicable federal and state laws. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
Call 205.328.9200 Claim Application [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 3:24 am
Trounson (at right) was required to supply a declaration/power of attorney in his U.S. application attesting to the fact that he was an inventor of this claim. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
By collapsing the distinction between the two duties, Hickinbottom J conflates these authorities and produces some very muddy waters. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
As the court of appeals described it: the district court sent the parties a letter order "to express [its] concern about the application of the statutory mandatory minimum sentence in this case and to ask whether Mr. [read post]
17 May 2014, 5:01 am
They searched his property and found a bucket of waste water in the backyard. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 5:04 am
It has faced some criticism both from police organizations who were concerned about its application and rights activists who believed the bill was watered down, but all parties agree that the bill is a good step forward. [read post]