Search for: "Cooper v. Brown" Results 361 - 380 of 641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
See, e.g., In re Brown Jordan Co., 219 USPQ 375 (TTAB 1983) (holding that stamping the mark after purchase of the goods, on a tag attached to the goods that are later transported in commerce, is sufficient use). [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Brown, Alex Engler, and Henry Claypool to discuss how people with disabilities are impacted by current technology and legislation on this issue: Loren DeJonge Schulman discussed Schedule F, a Trump administration federal workforce policy, and its potential implications on national security. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:20 am by Marcel Pemsel
In its recent decision in CEDC International v EUIPO - Underberg (Forme d’un brin d’herbe dans une bouteille), T-145/22, the General Court had the opportunity to clarify the scope of Art. 8(3) EUTMR. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:42 am
Although intellectual property was originally meant to protect 'the labours of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears' (Davoll v Brown, 1845), its use has recently shifted, from a primary force in company growth to a strategic asset frequently asserted for defensive purposes. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 1:19 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Senate voted to confirm Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court of the United States, according to CNN. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
  Gerald Rosenberg bases his controversial claim that lawyers cannot bring about substantial social change on the impact of Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
There were a handful of resolved cases reported:  Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 10:21 am
There's a provocative piece on the jiplp weblog, "Premier League v QC Leisure: an opinion about an opinion -- what's your opinion? [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am by Jay Yurkiw
Nemaha Brown Watershed Joint District No. 7, No. 06-CV-2248 (D. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:51 am by Dennis Hirsch
Scarlet that ISPs may not be asked to filter content to protect copyright, and its landmark decision in Google v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 28 March 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Brown v Channel 5. [read post]