Search for: "Cost v. Commonwealth"
Results 361 - 380
of 671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
Commonwealth, Department of Insurance (Koken), 889 A.2d 550 (Pa. 2005). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
Commonwealth, Department of Insurance (Koken), 889 A.2d 550 (Pa. 2005). [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Karass Issue: Whether a public sector union may include in non-members’ agency fees costs for litigation outside the bargaining unit. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:01 am
In March 2009, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, issued an opinion in Tristani v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am
For an example of a state high court decision that affirmed a citizen’s conviction for surreptitiously recording his encounter with the police, see Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
” Similarly, in DNC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Motto & Ors v Trafigura Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 90206 (Costs) (29 June 2011) Interest on £100m+ costs claimed by Leigh Day in group action against Trafigura runs from date of interim or final costs certificate, not compromise agreement. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Without dissent, the justices in Porter v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:53 am
Kortlander's costs in the appeal [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm
Kortlander’s costs in the appeal. * ! [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:59 pm
Douglas, then, points to a shift with Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Defence Minister Peter Dutton will not receive full legal costs as the federal court has ruled that his defamation case against Shane Bazzi could have been fought in lower court. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
Colten v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
This will undoubtedly save the small business unnecessary costs and attorneys’ fees. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
This will undoubtedly save the small business unnecessary costs and attorneys’ fees. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
As ruled in McCarthy v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm
Braun v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:08 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
Because the Regulation merely limited the "use" of trade marks they did not strip away the trade mark owner;s right to prevent or exclude others from using their mark (citing Arnold J in Pinterest v Premium Interest). [read post]
