Search for: "Cost v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 31,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2009, 9:15 am
Reasons for judgement were released yesterday (Narvaez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:42 am
Golden Gate Association v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:42 am
Golden Gate Association v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:42 am
Golden Gate Association v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
In its final decision, the court stated that the approach it should take would be for the claimant to have ‘(1) 100% its costs relatively generously assessed (by IPEC standards) down to the date of the Defendant’s offer in December 2012, (2) ... a reasonable proportion of its costs, but not all of them, after the date of that offer’. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:37 pm
In the recent case (Brar v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:32 am
In Pliego v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
In today’s case (Cue v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:07 pm
See LEASE PARTNERS CORP. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 10:06 am
Cir. 2013) Download 12-1085.Opinion.3-21-2013.1Panel: Newman (author), Lourie, Schall It's a general rule of commercial litigation in the United States that parties must bear their own legal costs. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
Bank v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:40 am
” Marcoski v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
” Marcoski v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:24 pm
Moore v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
Jan. 28, 2020) (finding an award for fees and costs inappropriate where petitioner had physically abused respondent and their child); Asumadu v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
Jan. 28, 2020) (finding an award for fees and costs inappropriate where petitioner had physically abused respondent and their child); Asumadu v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
In this week’s case (Tsalamandris v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 – Read judgment The general rule in civil law cases is that the loser pays the winner’s legal costs, even if the case settles before trial. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:59 am
The Eighth Circuit recently addressed an issue which the United States Supreme Court expressly side-stepped in 2007 when it decided United States v. [read post]
