Search for: "Cox v. Amend"
Results 361 - 380
of 563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards… [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
An important First Amendment case decided in 2012 is that of Hosanna Tabor v EEOC (10-553 01/11/2012), which concerned a ‘ministerial exception’ to the operation of Federal discrimination laws. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 12:19 pm
Cox's attorneys, Benjamin Souede and Professor (and blogger) Eugene Volokh, argued that all individuals who speak to the public are entitled to First Amendment libel protections, not just media personnel. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:59 pm
” Tom Cox, the foreclosure defense lawyer from Maine, agrees. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:13 am
First Amendment lawyer and former law professor, Marc J. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:31 am
Cox's email instructed all precinct 4 officers to handle the complaint. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Some of our readers have been following Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
However, the husband died without amending the pension plan documents to replace his ex-wife as the designated beneficiary. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
On Thursday 23 February 2012, Tesla’s libel and malicious falsehood claim against BBC Top Gear was dismissed by Tugendhat J, after an application to amend its original claim (Tesla Motors Ltd & Anor v BBC [2012] EWHC 310 (QB) (23 February 2012). [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:55 am
The competition law update chapter in this new publication, prepared by our firm, includes discussions of: (i) the 2009 and 2010 amendments to the Competition Act, (ii) Competition Act enforcement and penalties, (iii) key enforcement developments in the past two years (including conspiracy and misleading advertising law developments), (iv) a discussion of key implications of Canada’s new competition laws for Canadian real estate agents and brokers, (v) a discussion of the… [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 7:58 am
The competition law update chapter in this new publication, prepared by our firm, includes discussions of: (i) the 2009 and 2010 amendments to the Competition Act, (ii) Competition Act enforcement and penalties, (iii) key enforcement developments in the past two years (including conspiracy and misleading advertising law developments), (iv) a discussion of key implications of Canada’s new competition laws for Canadian real estate agents and brokers, (v) a discussion of the… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:49 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Some of our readers have been following Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:55 pm
— Cox v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 7:18 am
See Obsidian Finance Group v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
In my preview of Tuesday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:14 pm
Supreme Court in Gertz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Cox. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:39 am
Then along came Lawrence v. [read post]
