Search for: "Craig v. Doe" Results 361 - 380 of 812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Derek Barr, Roger Craig White, and Chris Nicole White ("Plaintiffs-Appellants"), students at William Blount High School ("the school") in Blount County, Tennessee, would like to express their southern heritage by wearing clothing depicting the Confederate flag at school. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:48 am
(See, e.g., his concurring opinion in Craig v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Craig Dennis Feiser, Mary Margaret Giannini, Assistant General Counsel, Jon Robert Phillips, Jason Robert Teal, Gabriella Young, O^ce of General Counsel, City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendants-Appellees. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
Therefore, we hold that the statute does not deny males equal protection of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States....I don’t think this is consistent with the Supreme Court’s Equal Protection Clause cases, both before 1979 (Craig v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 3:18 am
§ 8-1-107 provides that the repeal of a statute does not affect pending actions. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a report on various pre-trial applications in the case of Craig McLachlan v Fairfax Media. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
It rejected the Article 6bis claim, concluding that Article 6bis does not create a right of action outside the Lanham Act. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
At trial, Samuel Shelton, a student at UALR, testified that, through the classified advertising website, Craig's List, he advertised for the sale of his new laptop for $1,300. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
The judgment reinforced the principle that ‘vulgar language used as a reprimand does not amount to defamation. [read post]