Search for: "D H O Thomas" Results 361 - 380 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2009, 1:06 pm by @ErikJHeels
(Westborough, MA; Daniel O'brien, President) Angel Performing Arts Inc. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:00 pm
I'd like to see a more comprehensive privacy bill that could be applied to all current and future technology. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Most notably, the statute prohibiting employment of any “unauthorized alien” defines that term to exclude persons “authorized to be so employed … by the [DHS Secretary],” 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(h)(3)—and the longstanding DHS regulation exercising that power authorizes employers to hire, among others, most “alien[s] who ha[ve] been granted deferred action. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch)   Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and then claiming it:… [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:57 am by Michael Oykhman
Depravation does not rely on the Crown proving who the rightful owner of the motor vehicle is, only that the Crown proves that the accused in fact, did not have a possessory right or proprietary interest in the motor vehicle (see: O’Keefe v R, 2007 NLCA 58 (CanLII); and Regina v McDowell, 1970 CanLII 1072 (ONCA)). [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Patent Baristas), US: How to avoid a permanent injunction: the lessons of Amgen v Hoffman-LaRoche: (Patent Docs), US: Jarvik Heart’s PTE request based on PMA shell/module submission dates flatlines; ruling on initiation of PTE ‘review period’ mirrors FDA policy for ‘fast track’ products: (FDA Law Blog) Pharma & Biotech - Products Kytril (Granisetron) – Exclusivity ‘parking’ still possible under… [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
” After all, Faigman starts off his essay with a quotation from Thomas Huxley that “science is nothing but trained and organized common sense. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Similar to Chelak's ruling in Jannone, Kwidis also stated, in dicta, that evidence of insurance may come into evidence at trial for limited purposes.Judge Thomas Burke of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas ruled in Glushefski v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am by Vincent LoTempio
Although the legal community may be thinking of other things on July 26, 2010 I thought I would let you know that this particular piece of legislation signed into law on July 26, 1990, by President George H. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:15 am by Kevin O'Keefe
Law firms with blogs or lawyers blogging (Click link to go to list of blogs by that firm): Adams and Reese Akerman Senterfitt Akin Gump Allen Matkins Alston & Bird Andrews Kurth Arent Fox Armstrong Teasdale Arnold & Porter Baker & Daniels Baker Hostetler Baker & McKenzie Barnes & Thornburg Husch Blackwell Sanders Blank Rome Bracewell & Giuliani Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels … [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:07 pm by rbm3
Hein, 2011 KF246 P73 2011 See Catalog Civil law -- Canada RULED BY LAW : REPRINTED FROM VOLUME 12 OF THE SUPREME COURT LAW REVIEW, SECOND SERIES / LIONEL D. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
Likewise, setting adequate compensation, as required under TRIPS Article 31(h) has never been predictable or easily administered.[15] Additionally, and of similar importance, other questions remain outstanding, including which countries qualify for parallel imports,[16] navigating the complexities of licensing agreements,[17] ensuring timeliness during public health emergencies,[18] and achieving cooperation from pharmaceutical companies who arguably have little incentive to cooperate.[19]… [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
He has hired Sydney media lawyer Mark O’Brien to take legal action. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has explained that this standard is designed “[t]o discourage the litigation of frivolous, unreasonable, groundless, or vexatious claims, but without discouraging the rigorous enforcement of federal rights under Title VII. [read post]