Search for: "DALE v. STATE"
Results 361 - 380
of 932
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 10:12 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
And United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:47 pm
Nelson in 1972, a view that has been rejected by every other federal court since United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Another peculiarity is what happened during oral argument in Hamdan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm
United States] Housing disparate impact theory, dodged by administration last time around, returns to Court [Bloomberg, Daniel Fisher; Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
” *John Nieman suggests that the Court’s single-sentence denial of the states’ petitions may be the perfect book-end to its single-sentence denial of the first same-sex marriage claim in 1972: “With forty years of hindsight, the Court’s one-liner saying effectively nothing in Baker v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
In Holt v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:38 pm
First, as co-blogger Dale Carpenter points out, same-sex marriage will now soon be legal in five more states, bringing the total to thirty-five. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Dale Carpenter is the Earl R. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
There’s the path of Roe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:16 am
General panels topics included Litigation and Legislative Updates; Tribal v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:07 am
The EEOC alleged in this lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:52 am
”); Romer v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:39 am
“Necessarily,” the Court held in Washington v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 2:01 pm
DeLay v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:47 am
According to the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
We also know that the President (the chief law enforcement officer of the United States) announced last February that there has not been a “smidgen of corruption” even though neither he nor the Department of Justice could have examined all the evidence, in particular the emails and other electronic information. [read post]
[Will Baude] Understanding the federal court ruling that allows an FLDS church leader not to testify
21 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
… He has so stated under oath. [read post]
