Search for: "DEAL v. DEAL"
Results 361 - 380
of 43,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 2:07 am
Serious Organised Crime Agency v Szepietowski and others [2009] EWHC 344 (Ch); [2009] WLR(D) 74 “The statutory exclusion regime concerning restrictions on dealing with property set out in s 252 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 was intended to be self-contained and exhaustive. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:46 am
FH (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A delay of two years and nine months in dealing with an application for indefinite leave to remain constituted culpable and undue delay on the part of the Secretary of State for the Home Department and was productive of conspicuous unfairness in the case [...] [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:16 am
The Square Deal Furniture Company* Deborah Waire Post Every time I teach Williams v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court has issued its opinion in the case CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
Navkar Infra Projects Ltd Apex Court while dealing with a case filed by […] The post Gunmala Sales Ltd v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:52 am
Certiorari Granted in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:13 am
McNea v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:52 am
This post does not deal with the ICJ’s judgment in Germany v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:54 pm
The deal was the third energy transaction the firm handled in recent days. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
See Pennsylvania Avenue Funds v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 10:44 pm
The post How will a no deal Brexit affect residential property? [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:43 pm
This has not surprisingly generated a great deal of interest and amicus briefing. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 2:01 pm
You can order a signed copy of the District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
The reversal of the injunction came just two days after the court heard a speedy interlocutory appeal in the case (C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:11 pm
Citigroup has consented to pay $285 million to settle a Securities and Exchange Commission complaint accusing the bank of misleading investors in a $1 billion derivatives deal—a collateralized debt obligation called Class V Funding III. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:11 pm
I shall provide two important hints.Hint #1: The source is one of the following:- Access Copyright (“AC”)- Association of Universities and Colleges Canada (“AUCC”)- Canadian Association of Research Libraries ("CARL")- Council of Ministers of Education Canada ("CMEC")Hint #2:The landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision dealing with fair dealing, namely CCH. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:24 pm
China Business Law Blog has an interesting post on the Danone v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 pm
Costs webinar from Kings Chambers’ Matthew Smith and Paul Hughes discussing how the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15 affects the way that solicitors ought to perform retainers dealing with the administration of estates and the likelihood and course of assessment of their […] The post Costs webinar on Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP first appeared on Legal Costs Specialists - Gibbs Wyatt Stone. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:15 am
In their paper, “Section 2 Mangled: FTC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 9:47 pm
In Firefighters’ Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust v. [read post]
