Search for: "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS"
Results 361 - 380
of 689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
The "correct" answers are "citizens" in their respective states (for senators) or district (for members of the House). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm
The first methodology was based on the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:21 am
As shown in a July 27, 2012 opinion from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (here), a misdemeanor conviction based on the Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine can not only result in criminal penalties but can also include “career-ending” consequences, in the form of a lengthy ban from participating in governmental programs. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 1:55 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed that ruling. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:01 pm
San Francisco, Milwaukee, Seattle and the District of Columbia have also passed mandatory paid sick leave bills in recent years. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:02 am
Our immigration law attorneys represent clients in Manassas, Woodbridge, Stafford, Alexandria, Arlington, Fredericksburg, Fairfax and all of Northern Virginia, as well as throughout Maryland and the District of Columbia. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
They are correct in some respects. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:21 pm
Mack Trucks: OMB also completed review and EPA released, on August 30, 2012, a version (not very clean) of a final Nonconformance Penalties for On-Highway Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines rule in response to the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Mack Trucks v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
Ten years later, while in private practice, he defended the constitutionality of a District of Columbia gun-control measure in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:31 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, held that the FDA must prohibit the importation of drugs that fall below the agency’s standards, including drugs used in lethal injection protocols. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:26 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina agreed that § 4248 was not constitutional and granted dismissal. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
Programs for Children with Special Health Care Needs Bureau of Special Heath Care Needs Department of Health and Senior Services 930 Wildwood Drive P.O. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
They were walking down the road back toward their house when a Department of Correction truck driven by Jeffrey McKay crashed into and killed Woods’ son. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court now sees itself correcting an erroneous and artificial barrier between church and state, despite the federalism proclivities of most of the conservative members of the current Court. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
Paylor, a Vietnam veteran, who had worked with the recreations department, had been a corrections officer, and recently retired from the Department of Transportation, testified that he and Cameron had been friends `most of my life. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on March 10. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:46 am
The second, which has accompanied the first, is a greatly reduced flow of information from the Department of Justice to the public concerning the rate of death penalty prosecutions and their actual results.INCREASED CONTROL OF DEATH PENALTY DECISION-MAKING BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALPrior to 1995, Justice Department regulations specified only that the death penalty could not be sought without the written authorization of the Attorney General. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
According to Donald Trump and his (personal) attorneys, however, the correct answer is “no. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
