Search for: "Darks v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 2,274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Jason Kelley
California EFF Blog Post: State v Burch EFF Amicus in State v Burch  New Jersey’s State v Carty Minnesota’s State v Fort Other Resources Harlan Yu of Upturn EFF Blog Post: So-called “Consent Searches” Harm Our Digital Rights 2020 Upturn report on law enforcement searching mobile phones  2020 Upturn written testimony to DC Council on police budget and surveillance technologies  EFF Blog… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:23 pm by Karen Gullo
—The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today urged the Supreme Court today to review and reverse a lower court decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:10 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit held, or whether the court must also find that the state court’s application of Chapman v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Zubaydah: The case involves allegations by a prisoner at Guantanamo Bay that he was tortured by CIA contractors at a CIA “dark site. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
White (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, October 8, 2021 Tags: Capital allocation, Executive Compensation, Liquidity, Market conditions, Repurchases, Shareholder value SEC Form 10-K Comments Regarding Climate-Related Disclosures Posted by Brian V. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:39 am by Daniel Harawa
While the justices pressed both sides, there was one sticking point for the government that many justices kept returning to: United States v. [read post]