Search for: "Davis v. Strong"
Results 361 - 380
of 665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
Alien Tort Statute case, Filártiga v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm
Grounds 2 and 3 – ‘Causation’ The Court of Appeal did not accept that the evidence on the discriminatory effect of the right to rent scheme was as strong as had been held at first instance. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:43 am
Even now that there is strong competition in the form of Jan Luba QC and Liz Davies’ ‘Housing Allocations and Homelessness’, a new edition of ‘Homelessness and Allocations’ is a significant publication. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
Davis v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
Roe was a strong, nonpartisan seven-two decision in 1973. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
The notion that M’Culloch v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 7:03 am
" In so holding, the court considered and then rejected the Davis v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 7:03 am
" In so holding, the court considered and then rejected the Davis v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s announcement in New York Times v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:41 am
Louisiana October 7, 2019 – Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in Ramos v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
They are paid by the United States of America to help protect and make America strong by protecting American inventors and protecting American invention. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:09 am
If her FTC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v Davis, 13… [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, a few years ago in Arlington v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Jennifer Davis: class consciousness among judges in English law of 19th c. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Overall, this is a nice cite for the proposition that there’s a strong fair use argument in support of excerpting online discourse. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:02 am
Zorach v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
Romer v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
