Search for: "Day v. Mills" Results 361 - 380 of 885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
We accordingly reverse and direct the entry of summary judgment for the State. * * * In 1928, a ten acre plot including the Mill Pond was conveyed to the Association. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:04 pm
This week the Supreme Court decided Wallace v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, said the Appellate Division, 4 NYCRR 208.3(c) "... is inconsistent with the statutory scheme of FOIL," which '"imposes a broad standard of open disclosure in order to achieve maximum public access to government documents'", citing  Matter of Schenectady County Socy. for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Inc. v Mills, 74 AD3d 1417. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, said the Appellate Division, 4 NYCRR 208.3(c) "... is inconsistent with the statutory scheme of FOIL," which '"imposes a broad standard of open disclosure in order to achieve maximum public access to government documents'", citing  Matter of Schenectady County Socy. for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Inc. v Mills, 74 AD3d 1417. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:05 am by Wolfgang Demino
The deadline to file a notice of appeal was therefore August 5, 90 days after the May 7 judgment was signed.[3] See Tex. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:05 am by Wolfgang Demino
The deadline to file a notice of appeal was therefore August 5, 90 days after the May 7 judgment was signed.[3] See Tex. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:17 pm by Mary Whisner
Richardson, K5277 .T47 2009 v. 1 and v. 2 at Classified Stacks, publisher's page What's that? [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
Accordingly, Bacardi’s motion to dismiss must be granted (see Mayer's Cider Mill, lnc. v Preferred Mut, Ins. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
She learned she was pregnant just days before the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am by INFORRM
  This point was considered in the case of Howlett v Holding ([2006] EWHC 41 (QB)). [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:33 am
" (I think the days of this are past in most, but not all, jurisdictions.) [read post]