Search for: "Dean v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
As Justice Ginsburg wrote for a majority four years ago in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
United States, a 1996 case, challenged his arrest on the grounds that a reasonable officer would not have arrested him in the absence of an ulterior motive. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 11:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm
In Awad v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
The Supreme Court granted review to decide whether this violates the free exercise clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:03 am
On Day 1, the conference kicked off with the Keynote Session after a warm welcome from the Dean of the Law Faculty at the University of Cape Town (UCT), Professor Danwood Chirwa. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
United States—flew under the radar perhaps because it was decided narrowly; the Court upheld the discretion enjoyed by the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, which became known as “the Case of the Frozen Trucker. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
This defense comes from a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case (also, confusingly enough, named City of New York v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
United States case) is a bit more complicated than might appear at first blush.Let’s start with a simple part: to the extent that the president was asserting that he could seek review of any impeachment proceedings directly in the Supreme Court before any lower court had looked at the matter, his assertion would run smack dab into the most venerable of Supreme Court rulings, the 1803 case of Marbury v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Drawing on and quoting from Printz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:50 am
Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Dean Acheson once asked him what old Justice Harlan had been like. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Instead, it doubled down yesterday in a way that I struggled to believe when I saw it this morning: for a patent infringement case in San Diego (Southern District of California) in which Qualcomm stands very little to gain after the judge determined that any damage claims would be limited to a period starting in the spring of 2017, the United States' #1 female lawyer, former Stanford Law School dean and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan name partner Kathleen M. [read post]
