Search for: "Department of Justice v. Spring"
Results 361 - 380
of 599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
It’s finally Spring. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
On Wednesday morning, after opinions are released at ten o’clock, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on the issue of how difficult it will be to prove discrimination in home sales or rentals, in the case of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
Shingle Springs. v. # 12 Human trafficking Bakken. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:30 am
Finally, we sued the Department of Justice for failing to respond to multiple Freedom of Information Act requests. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:24 pm
In fact, paragraph 14 of the Decision reads as follows:The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in ESA v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:00 am
Three of seven justices are expected to retire simultaneously in January 2019, just as a new governor could be taking office. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:50 am
Among the most-watched petitions before the justices was that in King v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
Department of California Highway Patrol v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
Four years later, the Chief Justice again emphasized the need to base the operation of the Voting Rights Act on current data in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
II, Issue II, Spring 2014, ForthcomingMary C. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
II, Issue II, Spring 2014, ForthcomingMary C. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:10 pm
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
It’s not unusual for Justices to be absent from opinion days, though it has been mostly a full bench this spring. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am
Justice William J. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm
(Hoffner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
Section 5 of the VRA used to require preclearance of district lines (and other electoral changes) by the Department of Justice in covered jurisdictions, but the Supreme Court struck down the formula determining coverage in Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
A judge should only depart from the usual IPEC costs rules in "truly exceptional" cases. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:47 am
Preparing for his role in Melton v. [read post]
