Search for: "Derrick" Results 361 - 380 of 1,421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2017, 11:00 am by Jonathan E. Meyer
What the District Courts Said On October 17, Judge Derrick Watson in the District of Hawaii issued an opinion finding EO3 in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), and ordering a stop to its implementation. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:53 pm by Jonathan E. Meyer
What the District Courts Said On October 17, Judge Derrick Watson in the District of Hawaii issued an opinion finding EO3 in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), and ordering a stop to its implementation. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 1:40 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Judge Derrick Watson wrote in his opinion that the latest revision of the ban, “suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor,” and “lacks the sufficient finds that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from [the] specified countries would be ‘detrimental to the interests of the United States,” and “plainly discriminates based on nationality. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 3:28 pm by Ilya Somin
On the other hand, Judge Chuang rejects two other statutory arguments advanced by the plaintiffs, which were endorsed by Judge Derrick Watson in the Hawaii ruling: that the president failed to make statutorily required findings, and that he imposed visa waiver requirements beyond those permitted by Congress. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:14 pm by Madeline Henshaw-Greene
The order was set in go into effect on Wednesday, October 18, but was temporarily blocked on Tuesday by Judge Derrick K. [read post]
On October 17, 2017, Judge Derrick Watson granted a nationwide temporary restraining order holding that the newest travel ban executive order (dubbed “EO-3”) suffered the same legal maladies as its predecessor: “it lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be ‘detrimental to the interests of the United States’ . . . [read post]
On October 17, 2017, Judge Derrick Watson granted a nationwide temporary restraining order holding that the newest travel ban executive order (dubbed “EO-3”) suffered the same legal maladies as its predecessor: “it lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be ‘detrimental to the interests of the United States’ . . . [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 7:00 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law A few hours after Hawai'i District Judge Derrick Watson granted a nationwide preliminary injunction in Hawai'i v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Emma Kohse
  In the latest development in the travel ban litigation saga, on October 17 Judge Derrick Watson of the federal district court in Hawaii issued an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Hawaii v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:41 am by Immigration Prof
Peter Margulies on Lawfare writes: "On Tuesday, Judge Derrick Watson of the federal district court in Hawaii issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against President Donald Trump’s third executive order... [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm by Peter Margulies
On Tuesday, Judge Derrick Watson of the federal district court in Hawaii issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against President Donald Trump’s third executive order (which Watson referred to as “EO-3”) limiting entry of noncitizens into the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:58 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In the third iteration of the "Muslin Ban" or "Travel Ban" before the courts, federal District Judge Derrick Watson has issued an Order granting a nationwide preliminary injunction... [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:51 pm by Elie Mystal
Citing lack of evidence, Travel Ban 3.0 is temporarily stayed. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:38 pm by Ilya Somin
In today’s ruling, Judge Derrick Watson concluded that the new travel ban exceeds the authority granted to the president by Congress, for much the same reasons as its predecessor did. [read post]